We can not concur that possibly ones circumstances, and particularly the new Eggert situation, introduce a posture “wholly analogous” or whatsoever analogous to this exhibited in the example of Los angeles Bank. It question condition regulation off myself had coupons and you will financing relationships and you will involve difficulties completely regarding the and you may unusual compared to that style of from county regulation. They deal with activities and you may mention standards of law which i consider try completely unrelated so you can hence not applicable so you’re able to controlling things presented regarding Los angeles Action or perhaps in the moment attention. Yes the machine of county regulation out-of individual coupons and mortgage associations that’s mixed up in noted cases is not the similar of your own government legislation that we have been worried, nor perform instances discussing for example your state system have an excellent signal and this can be binding upon Government process of law, or be convincing, whenever discussing and you can construing the latest totally more style of legislation hence created the latest elaborate program away from management control applied to banks which happen to be instrumentalities of one’s Federal government.

He affirmed that properties of counsel toward Los angeles Financial and its particular co-plaintiffs in the primary situation had been really worth $175,one hundred thousand to possess properties made because of the them up to June 29, 1949 and you may built their assessment into the numerous related situations

I have looked at most other regulators cited from the appellees thought to service its need for affirmance of your own purchase away from award here with the attract, and you may think he is instead of merit.